role 3
source pages
the deeper bibliography: egor, levin, miessler, and the source-system overview.
provenance
deep read
linked below ↓
hub map
four page roles, four different jobs
the pages should not compete with each other. each one should solve a different reading job.
role 0
constitution
the stable canonical layer: mission, wedge, v1, principles, trust ladder, business posture, and non-goals.
canonical
slow-moving
open doctrine →
role 1
proofboard
evidence-backed strategic claims, confidence, caveats, falsifiers, and roadmap implications.
current
belief -> implication
open module →
role 1.5
canon ops
the process layer for how the constitution gets updated, what is done, and what is still missing.
current
meta process
open module →
role 2
operating cadence
how truth moves: update rhythms, source hierarchy, kill conditions, and delta-only review loops.
current
process guardrails
open module →
role 2.5
harness map
the working shortlist of external harnesses worth trying, studying, or skipping for secondme.
current
build-vs-borrow
open module →
page contract
what belongs where
the main fix for duplication is to keep each page narrow.
constitution
what we are building
mission, wedge, v1, principles, trust ladder, business posture, non-goals.
overview
where we stand now
current posture, strongest beliefs, open tensions, and immediate focus.
proofboard
why we believe it
claim, evidence, caveat, falsifier, implication, confidence.
cadence
how truth gets updated
source hierarchy, review rhythm, open-loop discipline, and promotion rules.
canon ops
how the constitution is maintained
agent roles, card schemas, section thresholds, current status, and next implementation steps.
overview
what the team should keep in view
the point of the overview is not to repeat all the doctrine. it is to keep the active field visible: what seems settled, what is still soft, and what needs disciplined pressure next.
settled
chief of staff beats assistant
the system is valuable when it coordinates reality: priorities, people, approvals, timing, and follow-through.
doctrine
settled
scaffolding beats raw model delta
memory, orchestration, and decision surfaces appear more leverage-bearing than model chasing for real workflows.
strong belief
needs internal replication
in motion
wedge is role pressure, not just wealth
the strongest axis still looks like complexity x stakes x agency, with HNW as one likely first segment.
active bet
next
freeze the first onboarding-to-leverage flow
the product still needs one sharp flow where a user grants read-only access to live context, gets immediate insight, and sees tailored leverage already in motion.
current focus
active field
the five things a strong dashboard must expose
this is the information architecture shift suggested by the team discussion: less polished certainty, more readable tension.
01
active bets with kill conditions
every active bet should show confidence, test, owner, review date, and the condition under which the team would kill it.
02
traction signals, not just stories
surface the strongest confirming signal, strongest disconfirming signal, and the weird new signal that changed the map.
03
proof points below doctrine
doctrine should be brief. the evidence, caveats, and falsifiers should live in a linked proof layer.
04
market clock
track what changed outside in the last 30 days so the team does not keep solving a dead problem with beautiful language.
05
open loops with owners
every expensive hanging loop needs an owner, next step, and review date. loops without owners decay into mood.
design rule
capable of contradiction
a pre-pm-fit dashboard should be clear, alive, and slightly uncomfortable. otherwise it becomes a status object.
next clicks
where to go from here
one click for strategic belief. one click for team operating discipline. then deeper source pages for provenance.
recommended next click
constitution
the stable doctrine page: what secondme is, who it is for, what v1 is, and which principles and non-goals govern decisions.
open constitution →
proof layer
proofboard
the evidence layer: claims, caveats, falsifiers, and roadmap implications behind the strongest beliefs.
open proofboard →